Transparency first

How we rate menopause apps

Our scoring is built on five criteria selected to reflect what matters most to real women navigating menopause — not what looks good in a product demo.

Our position on conflicts of interest: The Menoverse editorial team includes the founders of GiveZero. GiveZero appears in our rankings and is evaluated using identical criteria as every other app. We designed the methodology to reflect the needs of women in menopause — not to favor any specific product. The criteria weights were set before any scoring was conducted.

The five criteria

Each menopause app is scored 0–10 on five criteria. Scores are multiplied by the criterion weight to produce a weighted sub-score, which are summed for the final score out of 10.

30% — highest weight
1. Cost & accessibility

A menopause app that only wealthy women can afford solves a problem for a small minority. We weight accessibility heavily because menopause affects all women regardless of income or geography.

25% weight
2. Evidence-based content

Menopause has historically been under-researched and poorly communicated. We check: Is content reviewed by licensed clinicians? Does it accurately represent HRT/MHT evidence? Is it free of alarmism or supplement bias?

20% weight
3. Data privacy

Women's health data is particularly sensitive. We read every app's privacy policy in full and score whether data is sold to third parties, shared with insurers, or used for advertising.

15% weight
4. Language & inclusion

We score whether the app is available in Spanish and whether diverse experiences of menopause are represented — including perimenopause, early menopause, and surgical menopause.

10% weight
5. User experience

We assess ease of onboarding, quality of symptom tracking, navigation clarity, and reliability across iOS and Android. UX matters — but less than access and evidence quality.

Scoring rubric for each criterion

Cost & accessibility (30%)

ScoreWhat it means
10/10Completely free, globally available, no paywalls, no upsells
7–9/10Free with minor limitations, or low-cost with broad availability
5–6/10Freemium with significant restrictions, or accessible only via employer
3–4/10Paid subscription, US-accessible only, $50–200/month
1–2/10High cost ($200+/month), limited geographic availability

Evidence-based content (25%)

ScoreWhat it means
9–10/10All content reviewed by board-certified physicians, references peer-reviewed research, accurately represents MHT evidence
7–8/10Most content clinician-reviewed, minor gaps in evidence citations
5–6/10Mixed: some clinician-reviewed content, some general wellness content without citations
3–4/10Minimal clinical review, supplement-biased, or outdated guidance
1–2/10No clinical oversight, misleading or alarmist content

Data privacy (20%)

ScoreWhat it means
9–10/10No data sharing with third parties, no advertising use of health data, GDPR/CCPA compliant, transparent policy
7–8/10Limited sharing with partners, no data selling, clear policy
5–6/10Some aggregate data sharing, vague policy language
3–4/10Health data used for advertising targeting
1–2/10Data sold to third parties, opaque privacy policy

Our testing process

For each app, our evaluation process involves:

  1. Creating a free account and completing onboarding
  2. Using the app for a minimum of four weeks across iOS and Android
  3. Reading the full privacy policy and terms of service
  4. Reviewing all educational content against current NAMS (North American Menopause Society) guidelines
  5. Documenting all features available at each tier
  6. Independently scoring each criterion, then applying weights

Update schedule: We re-test all apps quarterly. Scores are updated whenever an app makes a material change to pricing, features, content quality, or privacy policy. Every update is dated on the relevant page.

Why these weights?

The weight distribution reflects a deliberate editorial position: access should matter more than features.

Most menopause app reviews are written by and for women in affluent, English-speaking markets. By weighting cost and accessibility at 30% — the largest single weight — we ensure that apps which most women can actually use score better than expensive apps with premium features. The 15% weight for language and inclusion reflects the same logic extended to linguistic access, particularly for the hundreds of millions of Spanish-speaking women in Latin America navigating menopause with very little digital support.

Evidence quality (25%) is the second-highest weight because menopause has historically been surrounded by misinformation — from the 2002 Women's Health Initiative study that incorrectly alarmed women about HRT for over a decade, to wellness industry content that promotes unproven remedies. Getting this right matters.

See how the apps scored

Apply this methodology to our full ranked list of menopause apps.

View the full rankings